![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Microsoft:
Breakup Is Unnecessary
By EUN-KYUNG KIM, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - A proposal to split up Microsoft Corp.
(NasdaqNM:MSFT - news)
into separate companies is among a ``full array of options'' being
considered as remedies against the software maker.
A Microsoft spokesman denounced the proposal as
``extreme and radical.''
Attorneys for the Justice Department and the 19 states
that successfully sued Microsoft for antitrust violations are considering
ways to break up the company as a method to curb anticompetitive
practices. One reported option would be to split the company into two or
three parts, each selling separate products, such as the Windows operating
system and Internet content. Another alternative would be for Microsoft to
divest its popular Office software.
Any kind of divestiture is part of a ``full array of
options'' being discussed, a source close to the talks said Monday.
The news of a possible breakup contributed Monday to a
16 percent plunge in Microsoft shares, by $12.311/4 a share to $66.62, in
trading on the Nasdaq stock market. Investors also were disheartened by a
mediocre earnings report last Thursday and resulting stock downgrades by
analysts at SG Cowen Securities Corp. and the Goldman Sachs Group.
The government and the states have the option of filing
separate recommendations, but both sides hope to turn in a single
proposal. Each has until Friday to submit proposed remedies to U.S.
District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, who ruled April 3 that Microsoft
illegally used its dominance in the operating systems market to hurt
competition. The ruling came after a 78-day trial that began in October
1998.
``There is nothing in the trial record or in this case
that would justify such an extreme and radical remedy,'' Microsoft
spokesman Jim Cullinan said Monday. ``This would be bad for Microsoft,
consumers and the entire industry.''
A court hearing to consider remedies has been scheduled
for May 24.
Plaintiffs in the case also are considering temporary
sanctions that could be imposed against Microsoft while the case makes its
way to the appeals court, said another person familiar with the talks.
Microsoft has until May 10 to respond to the
government's proposal, but it may ask for an extension depending on the
remedies requested.
``If the government goes beyond the scope of this trial
with the issues they raise in their filing, we're going to need an
appropriate amount of time to respond,'' Cullinan said.
The Wall Street Journal, USA Today and The Washington
Post reported Monday that the government favored a breakup of the company,
although details varied regarding how parts of the corporation would be
spun off.
None of the plans would require Microsoft to separate
its Web browser from Windows. The company's bundling of the two products
was a major issue in the government's lawsuit against Microsoft, Cullinan
noted as he contended that divesting Windows or Office from the company
would not be justified.
If the Justice Department calls for breaking up
Microsoft, it would be the agency's first such action since the 1974
antitrust suit against AT&T Corp. (NYSE:AWE
- news) that led to the
breakup of the telephone giant.
Microsoft has already made clear that it will appeal the
ruling against it. The case is considered likely to be end up before the
Supreme Court.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||